<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Different media require more than a direct translation</title> <atom:link href="http://www.murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/</link> <description>All creative works from Mur Lafferty</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Cliff Allen</title><link>http://www.murverse.com/2010/01/12/different-media-require-more-than-a-direct-translation/#comment-1644</link> <dc:creator>Cliff Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://murverse.com/?p=1093#comment-1644</guid> <description>You&#039;re so right that the newspaper industry needs to do a complete re-think of their mission and how to accomplish it.  They need to embrace how the online, interactive media can help them serve their audience.  (I started to say &quot;their readers,&quot; but, that&#039;s almost as out-of-date as the word &quot;paper.&quot;)It&#039;s especially ironic that Raleigh&#039;s News &amp; Observer, now owned by McClatchy, continues to lay off staff because of competition from online media.  When the Daniels family owned the N&amp;O, Frank Daniels III demonstrated how the newspaper industry could compete using online media.  You can get a sense of how Frank III viewed online technology in a brief item from 1994: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/I&#039;m just not sure that the news organizations that still call themselves &quot;newspapers,&quot; instead of &quot;news media,&quot; will make the transition that Frank III had in mind.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right that the newspaper industry needs to do a complete re-think of their mission and how to accomplish it.  They need to embrace how the online, interactive media can help them serve their audience.  (I started to say &#8220;their readers,&#8221; but, that&#8217;s almost as out-of-date as the word &#8220;paper.&#8221;)</p><p>It&#8217;s especially ironic that Raleigh&#8217;s News &amp; Observer, now owned by McClatchy, continues to lay off staff because of competition from online media.  When the Daniels family owned the N&amp;O, Frank Daniels III demonstrated how the newspaper industry could compete using online media.  You can get a sense of how Frank III viewed online technology in a brief item from 1994: <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/" rel="nofollow">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0REL/is_n3_v94/ai_15097571/</a></p><p>I&#8217;m just not sure that the news organizations that still call themselves &#8220;newspapers,&#8221; instead of &#8220;news media,&#8221; will make the transition that Frank III had in mind.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.murverse.com @ 2012-02-08 18:16:11 by W3 Total Cache -->
